<disp-quote>

Appears in

Frequency

<body>

Zero or more times

<p>

Zero or more times

<sec>

Zero or more times

Describes a citation from another source. Generally, this information is displayed in a document with indentation, more than three lines and a different font size to highlight it in the document.

For the @content-type attribute the allowed values are:

  • verbatim

  • dedication

  • epigraph

  • example

  • block-citation

Examples:

Exemple of <disp-quote> for verbarim:

<disp-quote content-type="verbatim">
    <p>We suppose (i) that a priori judgement will play a part in the operation of any coherent system of belief, and (ii) that non-cognitivism about necessity had probably better grant a role for judgements of necessity as co-ordinate to (some) a priori judgements. If supposition (i) is wrong, then global Caution about necessitated judgements is, after all, at the service of the non-cognitivist about necessity</p>
</disp-quote>

Exemple of <disp-quote> for epigraph:

<disp-quote content-type="epigraph">
    <p>La voie d’accès au présent a nécessairement la forme d’une archéologie.</p>
    <attrib>Giorgio Agamben, <italic>Qu’est-ce que le contemporain ?</italic></attrib>
</disp-quote>

Exemple of <disp-quote> for dedication:

<disp-quote content-type="dedication">
    <p>En souvenir de Catherine Viollet</p>
</disp-quote>

Exemple of <disp-quote> for example:

<disp-quote content-type="dedication">
    <p>En souvenir de Catherine Viollet</p>
</disp-quote>

Exemple of <disp-quote> for block-citation:

<disp-quote content-type="dedication">
    <p>En souvenir de Catherine Viollet</p>
</disp-quote>

Exemple of general <disp-quote>:

<p>In the face of the failure of the transmission argument Wright would, apparently, endorse the view that Caution could still provide an adequate route to an anti-realist account of necessity, as can be gathered from the following passage:</p>
<p>
    <disp-quote>
        <p>We suppose (i) that a priori judgement will play a part in the operation of any coherent system of belief, and (ii) that non-cognitivism about necessity had probably better grant a role for judgements of necessity as co-ordinate to (some) a priori judgements. If supposition (i) is wrong, then global Caution about necessitated judgements is, after all, at the service of the non-cognitivist about necessity</p>
    </disp-quote>
</p>
<p>I disagree. In the previous section we saw that showing that Caution is an incoherent attitude is not an easy matter.</p>